- android.gs
- Compare
- X40 GT Racing vs Poco F5
Honor X40 GT Racing vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What X40 GT Racing does better (4) and where Poco F5 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
6.1Camera8.4
5.8Battery5.4
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X40 GT RacingPoco F5
| X40 GT Racing | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 161.1 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 181 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X40 GT Racing better than Poco F5?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Charged in 30 min90% vs 65%+38%
Why is Poco F5 better than X40 GT Racing?
- OLED panelNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X40 GT Racing: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 181 g+10%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.9 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | — | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI | HyperOS |
