- android.gs
- Compare
- View30 Pro vs X3 SuperZoom
Honor View30 Pro vs Realme X3 SuperZoom
What View30 Pro does better (7) and where X3 SuperZoom wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display6.8
8.7Camera9.3
5.4Battery3.1
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
View30 ProX3 SuperZoom
| View30 Pro | X3 SuperZoom | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.8 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.8 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 202 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is View30 Pro better than X3 SuperZoom?
- Optical stabilisationYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Wireless chargingYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- 5GYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Wired charging40 W vs 30 W+33%
- 4K selfie videoYes · X3 SuperZoom: No
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 55%+27%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
Why is X3 SuperZoom better than View30 Pro?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Main camera40 MP vs 64 MP+60%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
- Battery capacity4,100 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+2%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.96 GHz+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Yes | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic frost, Sunrise Orange | Glacier Blue, Arctic White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 437 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.96 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 477,905 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,579 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,100 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 3.0.1 | — |
