- android.gs
- Compare
- Play 60 Plus vs Reno12 F 4G
Honor Play 60 Plus vs OPPO Reno12 F 4G
What Play 60 Plus does better (5) and where Reno12 F 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display8.6
4.1Camera6.8
8.0Battery6.8
5.5Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 60 PlusReno12 F 4G
| Play 60 Plus | Reno12 F 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 163.1 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 187 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 60 Plus better than Reno12 F 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than Play 60 Plus?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 2,100 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Play 60 Plus: Yes
- Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 395 ppi+51%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 32 MP6.4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Play 60 Plus: Yes
- Weight197 g vs 187 g+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.7 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Green, Black, White | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 431,840 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,468 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8.0 | ColorOS 15 |
