- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic4 vs Black Shark 4
Honor Magic4 vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4
What Magic4 does better (14) and where Black Shark 4 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display8.5
8.9Camera7.3
5.8Battery6.6
7.5Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic4Black Shark 4
| Magic4 | Black Shark 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.9 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic4 better than Black Shark 4?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Black Shark 4: No
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Black Shark 4: No
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 395 ppi+9%
- Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
- Weight199 g vs 210 g+6%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.7″+2%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Why is Black Shark 4 better than Magic4?
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+30%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Magic4: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 163.6 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Cyan, Gold | Mirror Black, Pale Grey, Black, Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 694 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.1% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 617,456 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,448 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6 | Joy UI 12.5 |
