- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic3 vs X60 Pro
Honor Magic3 vs Vivo X60 Pro
What Magic3 does better (11) and where X60 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic3X60 Pro
| Magic3 | X60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 158.6 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 73.2 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 179 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic3 better than X60 Pro?
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- Stereo speakersYes · X60 Pro: No
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+10%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Pixel density456 ppi vs 398 ppi+15%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Resolution (width)1,344 px vs 1,080 px+24%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio94.9% vs 90.1%+5%
Why is X60 Pro better than Magic3?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Magic3: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Magic3: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight203 g vs 179 g+13%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.5+27%
- Thickness9 mm vs 7.6 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Golden Hour (Vegan Leather), Blue Hour (Vegan Leather), Black, White | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,344 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 456 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 818 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 94.9% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 639,612 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,490 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.53 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 5.0 | Funtouch 11.1 |
