android.gs
Compare
Magic V3 vs X Fold2

Honor Magic V3 vs Vivo X Fold2

What Magic V3 does better (16) and where X Fold2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024Magic V3

8.2Score

16 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

Vivo · 2023X Fold2

8.0Score

5 advantages≈ $1,450

5.6Display5.4

7.5Performance6.0

8.6Camera6.8

6.8Battery8.9

8.4Features6.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V3X Fold2

	Magic V3	X Fold2	Difference
Height	156.6 mm	161.3 mm	−4.7 mm
Width	145.3 mm	143.4 mm	+1.9 mm
Thickness	4.4 mm	6 mm	−1.7 mm
Weight	226 g	279 g	−53 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V3 better than X Fold2?

AnTuTu score1,589,991 vs 1,314,521+21%
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,461 vs 4,769+35%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Optical zoom3.5× vs 2×+75%
Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+7%
Weight226 g vs 279 g+23%
4K selfie videoYes · X Fold2: No
eSIMYes · X Fold2: No
Pixel density402 ppi vs 360 ppi+12%
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
USB version3.1 vs 2+55%

Why is X Fold2 better than Magic V3?

Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
Measured brightness1,076 nits vs 1,308 nits+22%
Max video4K vs 8K
Charged in 30 min82% vs 115%+40%
Loudspeaker loudness-28.3 LUFS vs -25.8 LUFS+-9%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Magic V3≈ $1,1008.2	Vivo X Fold2≈ $1,4508.0
Design
Weight	226 g	279 g
Thickness	4.4 mm	6 mm
Height	156.6 mm	161.3 mm
Width	145.3 mm	143.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Plastic	—
Ingress protection	IPX8	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	King Kong Rhinoceros	—
Colours	Velvet Black, Snow, Tundra Green, Red	Black, Blue, Red
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	7.9″	8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	2,156 px	1,916 px
Resolution (height)	2,344 px	2,160 px
Pixel density	402 ppi	360 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,800 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,076 nits	1,308 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	89.3%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	1,589,991	1,314,521
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,461	4,769
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,759	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.49"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	20 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,150 mAh	4,800 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	—
Active use (test)	10.1 h	—
Wired charging	66 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	82%	115%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28.3 LUFS	-25.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	—
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Dual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	OriginOS 3