android.gs
Compare
Magic V3 vs Phantom V Fold

Honor Magic V3 vs Tecno Phantom V Fold

What Magic V3 does better (23) and where Phantom V Fold wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024Magic V3

8.2Score

23 advantages≈ $1,100

Higher score

Tecno · 2023Phantom V Fold

5.9Score

1 advantage≈ $1,100

5.6Display3.9

7.5Performance5.0

8.6Camera3.7

6.8Battery6.9

8.4Features4.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V3Phantom V Fold

	Magic V3	Phantom V Fold	Difference
Height	156.6 mm	159.4 mm	−2.8 mm
Width	145.3 mm	140.4 mm	+4.9 mm
Thickness	4.4 mm	6.9 mm	−2.6 mm
Weight	226 g	299 g	−73 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V3 better than Phantom V Fold?

AnTuTu score1,589,991 vs 999,348+59%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,461 vs 3,963+63%
Measured brightness1,076 nits vs 492 nits2.2×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom V Fold: No
Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Fold: No
Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Optical zoom3.5× vs 2×+75%
Battery capacity5,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 1,100 nits+64%
Weight226 g vs 299 g+32%

Why is Phantom V Fold better than Magic V3?

Loudspeaker loudness-28.3 LUFS vs -24.3 LUFS+-14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor Magic V3≈ $1,1008.2	Tecno Phantom V Fold≈ $1,1005.9
Design
Weight	226 g	299 g
Thickness	4.4 mm	6.9 mm
Height	156.6 mm	159.4 mm
Width	145.3 mm	140.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IPX8	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	King Kong Rhinoceros	—
Colours	Velvet Black, Snow, Tundra Green, Red	Black, White
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	7.9″	7.8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	2,156 px	2,000 px
Resolution (height)	2,344 px	2,296 px
Pixel density	402 ppi	388 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,800 nits	1,100 nits
Measured brightness	1,076 nits	492 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	88.6%	88%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score	1,589,991	999,348
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,461	3,963
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,759	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.3"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3.5×	2×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	20 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,150 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	—
Active use (test)	10.1 h	—
Wired charging	66 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	82%	80%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C
USB version	3.1	—
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-28.3 LUFS	-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	HiOS 13 Fold