- android.gs
- Compare
- Magic V Flip vs Phantom V Flip2
Honor Magic V Flip vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What Magic V Flip does better (8) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display6.0
6.3Camera5.2
7.1Battery6.2
4.7Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Magic V FlipPhantom V Flip2
| Magic V Flip | Phantom V Flip2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.3 mm | 170.8 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 73.4 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 196 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Magic V Flip better than Phantom V Flip2?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+15%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+6%
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Magic V Flip?
- Wired charging66 W vs 70 W+6%
- Pixel density403 ppi vs 413 ppi+2%
- Charged in 30 min90% vs 100%+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 167.3 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Colours | Black, White, Champagne, Green | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,520 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 403 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 90% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | — |
