How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Magic V Flip vs Razr 50 Ultra

Honor Magic V Flip vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

What Magic V Flip does better (7) and where Razr 50 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Honor Magic V Flip
Honor · 2024Magic V Flip
7.3Score
7 advantages≈ $690
Higher score
vs
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra
6.9Score
8 advantages≈ $540
5.9Display9.1
6.3Camera5.7
7.1Battery5.2
4.7Features6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Magic V FlipRazr 50 Ultra
75.6 × 167.37.274 × 171.47.1
Magic V FlipRazr 50 UltraDifference
Height167.3 mm171.4 mm−4.1 mm
Width75.6 mm74 mm+1.6 mm
Thickness7.2 mm7.1 mm+0.1 mm
Weight193 g189 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Magic V Flip better than Razr 50 Ultra?

  1. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+20%
  3. Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Wireless charging power40 W vs 15 W2.7×
  6. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
  7. Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Magic V Flip?

  1. Telephoto cameraNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
  2. Wireless chargingNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  4. eSIMNo · Magic V Flip: Yes
  5. Pixel density403 ppi vs 413 ppi+2%
  6. Weight193 g vs 189 g+2%
  7. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight193 g189 g
Thickness7.2 mm7.1 mm
Height167.3 mm171.4 mm
Width75.6 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Silicone polymer
Ingress protection—IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlack, White, Champagne, GreenSpring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse
Display
Screen size6.8″6.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,520 px2,640 px
Pixel density403 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness—1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.4%84.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 735
AnTuTu score—1,140,567
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—4,441
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,567
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate—60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,800 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)—12.1 h
Wired charging66 W45 W
Charged in 30 min90%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power40 W15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-22.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 8—
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare