- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Smart vs Reno12 F 4G
Honor 90 Smart vs OPPO Reno12 F 4G
What 90 Smart does better (7) and where Reno12 F 4G wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display8.6
3.7Performance3.8
5.6Camera6.8
7.7Battery6.8
8.1Features4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 SmartReno12 F 4G
| 90 Smart | Reno12 F 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.7 mm | 163.1 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Smart better than Reno12 F 4G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score532,792 vs 431,840+23%
- 5GYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- NFCYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,910 vs 1,468+30%
- Battery capacity5,330 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+7%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Reno12 F 4G: No
Why is Reno12 F 4G better than 90 Smart?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 2,100 nits2.5×
- OLED panelNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · 90 Smart: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · 90 Smart: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 166.7 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Amber Orange, Olive Green, Matte Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 532,792 | 431,840 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,910 | 1,468 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,330 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic OS 7.2 | ColorOS 15 |
