- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Lite vs Moto G54 Power
Honor 90 Lite vs Motorola Moto G54 Power
What 90 Lite does better (10) and where Moto G54 Power wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.8
4.1Performance4.2
7.0Camera8.0
4.2Battery7.3
7.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 LiteMoto G54 Power
| 90 Lite | Moto G54 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 161.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 73.8 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Lite better than Moto G54 Power?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- AnTuTu score530,583 vs 432,772+23%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,032 vs 1,918+6%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight179 g vs 192 g+7%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 45%+22%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.9 mm+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.5%+5%
Why is Moto G54 Power better than 90 Lite?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Memory card slotNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- eSIMNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 560 nits+12%
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 405 ppi+4%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Cyan Lake, Midnight Black | Midnight Blue, Pearl Blue, Mint Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 560 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 489 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 85.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 530,583 | 432,772 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,032 | 1,918 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.9 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | Hello UI |
