- android.gs
- Compare
- 90 Lite vs Camon 20 Pro
Honor 90 Lite vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What 90 Lite does better (11) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display7.2
4.1Performance4.4
7.0Camera6.4
4.2Battery6.0
7.1Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
90 LiteCamon 20 Pro
| 90 Lite | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 190 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 90 Lite better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
- 5GYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,032 vs 1,953+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Weight179 g vs 190 g+6%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 38%+45%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 85.7%+5%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than 90 Lite?
- OLED panelNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- AnTuTu score530,583 vs 574,290+8%
- Memory card slotNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 90 Lite: Yes
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Cyan Lake, Midnight Black | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 530,583 | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,032 | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | HIOS 14 |
