- android.gs
- Compare
- 80 Pro Flat vs Zero 30
Honor 80 Pro Flat vs Infinix Zero 30
What 80 Pro Flat does better (6) and where Zero 30 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.5
7.6Camera9.3
5.8Battery7.3
8.7Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
80 Pro FlatZero 30
| 80 Pro Flat | Zero 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.5 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 186 g | 185 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 80 Pro Flat better than Zero 30?
- Main camera160 MP vs 108 MP+48%
- Stereo speakersYes · Zero 30: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+15%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 950 nits+5%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 80%+25%
Why is Zero 30 better than 80 Pro Flat?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 80 Pro Flat: Yes
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Wired charging66 W vs 68 W+3%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · 80 Pro Flat: Yes
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 90%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green, Pink | Rome Green, Golden Hour, Fantasy Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 764 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,016 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 160 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | XOS 13 |
