- android.gs
- Compare
- 80 GT vs V25 Pro
Honor 80 GT vs Vivo V25 Pro
What 80 GT does better (8) and where V25 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
80 GTV25 Pro
| 80 GT | V25 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 158.9 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 73.5 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 190 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 80 GT better than V25 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · V25 Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,300 nits+8%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 80%+25%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+9%
Why is V25 Pro better than 80 GT?
- Optical stabilisationNo · 80 GT: Yes
- Main camera54 MP vs 64 MP+19%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 89.6%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 805 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 704,090 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,521 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,830 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.19 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 7 | Funtouch 12 |
