- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 Pro vs Poco F4 GT
Honor 70 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
What 70 Pro does better (11) and where Poco F4 GT wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display7.4
8.3Camera8.0
6.4Battery6.8
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
70 ProPoco F4 GT
| 70 Pro | Poco F4 GT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 162.5 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 210 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 Pro better than Poco F4 GT?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F4 GT: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F4 GT: No
- Weight192 g vs 210 g+9%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 395 ppi+9%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio91.1% vs 86.2%+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Why is Poco F4 GT better than 70 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Main camera54 MP vs 64 MP+19%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 3 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 176%+47%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold, Silver | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 758 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 86.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 952,124 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,637 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.59 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | HyperOS 2 |
