- android.gs
- Compare
- 70 Pro+ vs iQOO 9 Pro
Honor 70 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
What 70 Pro+ does better (7) and where iQOO 9 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.7
8.3Camera9.1
6.4Battery7.9
8.7Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
70 Pro+iQOO 9 Pro
| 70 Pro+ | iQOO 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.8 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 70 Pro+ better than iQOO 9 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO 9 Pro: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Main camera54 MP vs 50 MP+8%
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO 9 Pro: No
- Optical zoom3× vs 2.5×+20%
- Weight192 g vs 204 g+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.8 mm+7%
Why is iQOO 9 Pro better than 70 Pro+?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 70 Pro+: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · 70 Pro+: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
- Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 518 ppi+21%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 188%+57%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,440 px+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, Gold | Legend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | LTPO2 AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,652 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 518 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1% | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 862,324 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,708 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 188% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | Funtouch 12 (International) |
