- android.gs
- Compare
- 50 vs Galaxy M62
Honor 50 vs Samsung Galaxy M62
What 50 does better (12) and where Galaxy M62 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display5.2
7.6Camera7.5
4.9Battery8.0
7.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
50Galaxy M62
| 50 | Galaxy M62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 163.9 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.3 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 218 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 50 better than Galaxy M62?
- Wired charging66 W vs 25 W2.6×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Peak brightness750 nits vs 420 nits+79%
- Weight175 g vs 218 g+25%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 9.5 mm+22%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 86.7%+3%
Why is Galaxy M62 better than 50?
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+63%
- Memory card slotNo · 50: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · 50: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 50: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 73.8 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Colours | Frost Crystal, Amber Red, Emerald Green, Midnight Black, Honor Code | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 750 nits | 420 nits |
| Measured brightness | 748 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 470,348 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,971 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 105% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | One UI 5 |
