android.gs
Compare
400 Pro (China) vs Poco F8 Pro

Honor 400 Pro (China) vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro

What 400 Pro (China) does better (12) and where Poco F8 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2025400 Pro (China)

9.5Score

12 advantages≈ $450

Xiaomi · 2025Poco F8 Pro

9.6Score

7 advantages≈ $460

Higher score

9.0Display9.4

9.6Camera9.1

9.7Battery9.4

9.3Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

400 Pro (China)Poco F8 Pro

	400 Pro (China)	Poco F8 Pro	Difference
Height	156.3 mm	157.5 mm	−1.2 mm
Width	74.7 mm	75.3 mm	−0.6 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	204 g	199 g	+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Pro (China) better than Poco F8 Pro?

Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wireless chargingYes · Poco F8 Pro: No
Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,210 mAh+16%
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits+43%
4K selfie videoYes · Poco F8 Pro: No
Optical zoom3× vs 2.5×+20%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 419 ppi+10%
Resolution (width)1,264 px vs 1,156 px+9%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is Poco F8 Pro better than 400 Pro (China)?

Refresh rate120 Hz vs 560 Hz4.7×
Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+31%
Max video4K vs 8K
eSIMNo · 400 Pro (China): Yes
Weight204 g vs 199 g+3%
Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 400 Pro (China)≈ $4509.5	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro≈ $4609.6
Design
Weight	204 g	199 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm
Height	156.3 mm	157.5 mm
Width	74.7 mm	75.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Aluminosilicate glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Silver, Blue, Pink	Titanium Silver, Blue, Black
Display
Screen size	6.6″	6.6″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,264 px	1,156 px
Resolution (height)	2,736 px	2,510 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	419 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	560 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,094 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	89.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	—	2,480,773
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	8,610
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,068
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	200 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.4"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	2.5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	7,200 mAh	6,210 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	17.6 h
Wired charging	90 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	80%	81%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	50 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	62 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B