- android.gs
- Compare
- 400 Lite vs Blade V80 Pro
Honor 400 Lite vs ZTE Blade V80 Pro
What 400 Lite does better (16) and where Blade V80 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display6.8
7.1Camera6.2
7.7Battery5.1
8.1Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
400 LiteBlade V80 Pro
| 400 Lite | Blade V80 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 166 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 79 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 195 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 400 Lite better than Blade V80 Pro?
- Peak brightness3,500 nits vs 1,000 nits3.5×
- Wired charging35 W vs 22 W+56%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,230 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+5%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 317 ppi+24%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Blade V80 Pro: No
- Weight171 g vs 195 g+14%
Why is Blade V80 Pro better than 400 Lite?
- Memory card slotNo · 400 Lite: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 400 Lite: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Marrs Green, Velvet Black, Velvet Grey | White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 900 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 1,940 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 317 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 85.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Unisoc T7280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,368 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,303 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,230 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
