android.gs
Compare
400 Lite vs Camon 40 Pro

Honor 400 Lite vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro

What 400 Lite does better (7) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2025400 Lite

8.3Score

7 advantages≈ $470

Tecno · 2025Camon 40 Pro

8.6Score

12 advantages

Higher score

8.9Display8.5

5.6Performance6.4

7.1Camera9.1

7.7Battery7.3

8.1Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

400 LiteCamon 40 Pro

	400 Lite	Camon 40 Pro	Difference
Height	161 mm	164.3 mm	−3.3 mm
Width	74.6 mm	74.6 mm	=
Thickness	7.3 mm	7.3 mm	=
Weight	171 g	179 g	−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 400 Lite better than Camon 40 Pro?

Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
Peak brightness3,500 nits vs 1,100 nits3.2×
Major OS updates promised6 vs 32×
eSIMYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
Weight171 g vs 179 g+5%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is Camon 40 Pro better than 400 Lite?

Optical stabilisationNo · 400 Lite: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · 400 Lite: Yes
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,303 vs 3,218+40%
AnTuTu score635,368 vs 700,909+10%
Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
Max video1080p vs 4K
4K selfie videoNo · 400 Lite: Yes
Charged in 30 min43% vs 65%+51%
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 400 Lite≈ $4708.3	Tecno Camon 40 Pro8.6
Design
Weight	171 g	179 g
Thickness	7.3 mm	7.3 mm
Height	161 mm	164.3 mm
Width	74.6 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Marrs Green, Velvet Black, Velvet Grey	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,412 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	394 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	3,500 nits	1,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,045 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.9%	89.7%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra	Mediatek Dimensity 7300
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	635,368	700,909
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,303	3,218
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	873
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.67"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	4K
4K video frame rate	—	60 fps
Selfie camera	16 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,230 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	35 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	43%	65%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-28.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 9	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	6	3
EU label
Energy class	B	—
Battery charge cycles	1,400	—
Endurance per cycle	49 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—