- android.gs
- Compare
- 400 Lite vs WP62
Honor 400 Lite vs Oukitel WP62
What 400 Lite does better (11) and where WP62 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
400 LiteWP62
| 400 Lite | WP62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 172.2 mm | −11.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 81 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 15.3 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 364 g | −194 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 400 Lite better than WP62?
- Peak brightness3,500 nits vs 450 nits7.8×
- Weight171 g vs 364 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · WP62: No
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 15.3 mm2.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP62: No
- eSIMYes · WP62: No
- Repairability classB vs C
- Battery charge cycles1,400 vs 1,000+40%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 75.2%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is WP62 better than 400 Lite?
- Battery capacity5,230 mAh vs 11,000 mAh2.1×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Endurance per cycle49 h vs 120 h2.4×
- Memory card slotNo · 400 Lite: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Energy classB vs A
- Drop resistance classB vs A
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 364 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 15.3 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 81 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Boe glass |
| Colours | Marrs Green, Velvet Black, Velvet Grey | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,500 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 75.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,368 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,303 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,230 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 43% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | 120 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
