- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 vs Ace 5
Honor 300 vs OnePlus Ace 5
What 300 does better (5) and where Ace 5 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
300Ace 5
| 300 | Ace 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 161.7 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8.1 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 206 g | −31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 better than Ace 5?
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Ace 5: No
- Weight175 g vs 206 g+18%
- Thickness7 mm vs 8.1 mm+16%
Why is Ace 5 better than 300?
- AnTuTu score991,834 vs 2,324,1922.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,311 vs 6,318+91%
- Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 6,415 mAh+21%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+25%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+12%
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 450 ppi+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,264 px+5%
- Charged in 30 min106% vs 110%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Purple, Gray | Gray, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,264 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,780 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 91.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 991,834 | 2,324,192 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,311 | 6,318 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,597 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 6,415 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 106% | 110% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | ColorOS 15 |
