- android.gs
- Compare
- 300 vs 400
Honor 300 vs Honor 400
What 300 does better (8) and where 400 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
300400
| 300 | 400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 156.5 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 184 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 300 better than 400?
- AnTuTu score991,834 vs 864,286+15%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,311 vs 3,198+4%
- Weight175 g vs 184 g+5%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Charged in 30 min106% vs 88%+20%
- Thickness7 mm vs 7.3 mm+4%
Why is 400 better than 300?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+25%
- eSIMNo · 300: Yes
- Pixel density436 ppi vs 460 ppi+6%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,264 px+5%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 156.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Green, Purple, Gray | Midnight Black, Meteor Silver, Desert Gold, Tidal Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,264 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,664 px | 2,736 px |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,550 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 991,834 | 864,286 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,311 | 3,198 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,492 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,300 mAh | 5,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 106% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | MagicOS 10 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 56 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
