How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 300 Ultra vs iQOO Neo9 Pro

Honor 300 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro

What 300 Ultra does better (12) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Honor 300 Ultra
Honor · 2024300 Ultra
9.5Score
12 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9 Pro
9.2Score
11 advantages
9.3Display9.4
8.8Performance8.6
9.6Camera8.9
9.5Battery8.6
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

300 UltraiQOO Neo9 Pro
75.3 × 163.88.275.7 × 163.58
300 UltraiQOO Neo9 ProDifference
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm+0.3 mm
Width75.3 mm75.7 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+0.2 mm
Weight198 g190 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 300 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?

  1. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,702 vs 5,445+23%
  7. Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
  8. Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
  9. Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 3,000 nits+33%
  10. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
  12. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%

Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than 300 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,237,843 vs 2,386,903+7%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  3. Wired charging100 W vs 120 W+20%
  4. Max video4K vs 8K
  5. CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
  6. Weight198 g vs 190 g+4%
  7. Pixel density437 ppi vs 453 ppi+4%
  8. Charged in 30 min118% vs 136%+15%
  9. Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.9+5%
  10. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,260 px+3%
  11. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 300 UltraHonor 300 Ultra≈ $5909.5
Design
Weight198 g190 g
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm
Height163.8 mm163.5 mm
Width75.3 mm75.7 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP65IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Glass protectionGiant rhino glassSchott Xensation Up
ColoursBlack, WhiteFiery Red, Conqueror Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,700 px2,800 px
Pixel density437 ppi453 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness4,000 nits3,000 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,237,8432,386,903
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,7025,445
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)512 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/2f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.49"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3.8×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera50 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,300 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Wired charging100 W120 W
Charged in 30 min118%136%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power80 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximityFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 9Funtouch 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare