- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Smart vs F27 Pro+
Honor 200 Smart vs OPPO F27 Pro+
What 200 Smart does better (5) and where F27 Pro+ wins (15) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 SmartF27 Pro+
| 200 Smart | F27 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 162.7 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 74.3 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 177 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Smart better than F27 Pro+?
- Stereo speakersYes · F27 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · F27 Pro+: No
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is F27 Pro+ better than 200 Smart?
- Wired charging35 W vs 67 W+91%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx92.2×
- OLED panelNo · 200 Smart: Yes
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · 200 Smart: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 950 nits+12%
- Weight191 g vs 177 g+8%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP69 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx9 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green | Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 950 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 89.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 594,735 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,038 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 84% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.97 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8.0 | ColorOS 14 |
