- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Smart vs Pova 6 Neo
Honor 200 Smart vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo
What 200 Smart does better (12) and where Pova 6 Neo wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.5
4.9Performance4.4
4.1Camera4.6
7.6Battery8.3
5.5Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 SmartPova 6 Neo
| 200 Smart | Pova 6 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 168.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.6 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 206 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Smart better than Pova 6 Neo?
- 5GYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- AnTuTu score594,735 vs 568,329+5%
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 580 nits+47%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,038 vs 1,986+3%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight191 g vs 206 g+8%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 9.2 mm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 84.5%+3%
Why is Pova 6 Neo better than 200 Smart?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+35%
- NFCNo · 200 Smart: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Forest Green | Starry Silver, Speed Black, Comet Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 580 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 594,735 | 568,329 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,038 | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8.0 | HIOS 15 |
