- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Lite vs Reno13 F
Honor 200 Lite vs OPPO Reno13 F
What 200 Lite does better (7) and where Reno13 F wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 LiteReno13 F
| 200 Lite | Reno13 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 162.2 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.8 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Lite better than Reno13 F?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight166 g vs 192 g+16%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.8 mm+15%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 44%+7%
Why is Reno13 F better than 200 Lite?
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 2,100 nits3.5×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+29%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
- Memory card slotNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Colours | Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black | Graphite Grey, Plume Purple, Luminous Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 2,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 552,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,076 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.84 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | ColorOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 61 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
