- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Lite vs Reno11 F
Honor 200 Lite vs OPPO Reno11 F
What 200 Lite does better (5) and where Reno11 F wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 LiteReno11 F
| 200 Lite | Reno11 F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm | = |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 177 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Lite better than Reno11 F?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Weight166 g vs 177 g+7%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+10%
Why is Reno11 F better than 200 Lite?
- Wired charging35 W vs 67 W+91%
- AnTuTu score552,130 vs 841,497+52%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 1,100 nits+83%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,076 vs 2,398+16%
- Memory card slotNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 62%+32%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 177 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Panda glass |
| Colours | Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black | Palm Green, Ocean Blue, Coral Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 552,130 | 841,497 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,076 | 2,398 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.84 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | ColorOS 15 |
