- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Lite vs U24 Pro
Honor 200 Lite vs HTC U24 Pro
What 200 Lite does better (4) and where U24 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 LiteU24 Pro
| 200 Lite | U24 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 167.1 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 9 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 199 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Lite better than U24 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Weight166 g vs 199 g+20%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 9 mm+32%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is U24 Pro better than 200 Lite?
- AnTuTu score552,130 vs 1,016,461+84%
- Wired charging35 W vs 60 W+71%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,076 vs 3,380+63%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- Memory card slotNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 200 Lite: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 167.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Colours | Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black | Space Blue, Twilight White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 552,130 | 1,016,461 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,076 | 3,380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 60 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.84 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | — |
