- android.gs
- Compare
- XR21 vs X200 Pro mini
HMD XR21 vs Vivo X200 Pro mini
What XR21 does better (4) and where X200 Pro mini wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display8.2
6.9Camera9.3
4.3Battery9.1
9.5Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
XR21X200 Pro mini
| XR21 | X200 Pro mini | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 150.8 mm | +17.2 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 71.8 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 231 g | 187 g | +44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XR21 better than X200 Pro mini?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- eSIMYes · X200 Pro mini: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · X200 Pro mini: No
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.3″+3%
Why is X200 Pro mini better than XR21?
- RAM6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Wired charging33 W vs 90 W2.7×
- Peak brightness550 nits vs 4,500 nits8.2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
- OLED panelNo · XR21: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · XR21: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · XR21: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · XR21: Yes
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+19%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+65%
- Weight231 g vs 187 g+24%
- Process6 nm vs 3 nm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 231 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 150.8 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Midnight Black | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 406 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 550 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,805 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77% | 90.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,779,129 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 8,705 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,665 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 5 (China) |
