How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel Fold vs Razr 50 Ultra

Google Pixel Fold vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

What Pixel Fold does better (10) and where Razr 50 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel Fold
Google · 2023Pixel Fold
6.6Score
10 advantages≈ $440
vs
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra
6.9Score
15 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
4.2Display9.1
3.6Performance5.5
7.3Camera5.7
6.4Battery5.2
7.6Features6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel FoldRazr 50 Ultra
158.7 × 139.75.874 × 171.47.1
Pixel FoldRazr 50 UltraDifference
Height139.7 mm171.4 mm−31.7 mm
Width158.7 mm74 mm+84.7 mm
Thickness5.8 mm7.1 mm−1.3 mm
Weight283 g189 g+94 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel Fold better than Razr 50 Ultra?

  1. Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
  2. Battery capacity4,821 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+21%
  3. Major OS updates promised5 vs 3+67%
  4. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr 50 Ultra: No
  5. Screen size7.6″ vs 6.9″+10%
  6. Resolution (width)1,840 px vs 1,080 px+70%
  7. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  9. Wireless charging power20 W vs 15 W+33%
  10. Thickness5.8 mm vs 7.1 mm+22%

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Pixel Fold?

  1. AnTuTu score859,865 vs 1,140,567+33%
  2. Peak brightness1,450 nits vs 3,000 nits2.1×
  3. Wired charging30 W vs 45 W+50%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  5. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,833 vs 4,441+16%
  6. Weight283 g vs 189 g+50%
  7. Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
  8. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  9. Pixel density378 ppi vs 413 ppi+9%
  10. CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 3 GHz+5%
  11. Measured brightness1,232 nits vs 1,265 nits+3%
  12. Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight283 g189 g
Thickness5.8 mm7.1 mm
Height139.7 mm171.4 mm
Width158.7 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassSilicone polymer
Ingress protectionIPX8IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass VictusGorilla Glass Victus
ColoursPorcelain, ObsidianSpring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse
Display
Screen size7.6″6.9″
PanelFoldable OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,840 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,208 px2,640 px
Pixel density378 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness1,450 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,232 nits1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio82.7%84.9%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process5 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.85 GHz3 GHz
GPUMali-G710 MP7Adreno 735
AnTuTu score859,8651,140,567
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,8334,441
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—2,567
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera8 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,821 mAh4,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)—12.1 h
Wired charging30 W45 W
Charged in 30 min48%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power20 W15 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-22.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised53
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare