How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel Fold vs Razr 40 Ultra

Google Pixel Fold vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

What Pixel Fold does better (14) and where Razr 40 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel Fold
Google · 2023Pixel Fold
6.6Score
14 advantages≈ $440
Higher score
vs
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra
5.0Score
9 advantages≈ $300
4.2Display6.5
3.6Performance4.1
7.3Camera5.4
6.4Battery3.1
7.6Features3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel FoldRazr 40 Ultra
158.7 × 139.75.874 × 170.87
Pixel FoldRazr 40 UltraDifference
Height139.7 mm170.8 mm−31.1 mm
Width158.7 mm74 mm+84.7 mm
Thickness5.8 mm7 mm−1.2 mm
Weight283 g184 g+98 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel Fold better than Razr 40 Ultra?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 12 MP4×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
  3. Battery capacity4,821 mAh vs 3,800 mAh+27%
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 40 Ultra: No
  5. Major OS updates promised5 vs 3+67%
  6. Wireless charging power20 W vs 5 W4×
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,833 vs 3,645+5%
  8. Measured brightness1,232 nits vs 1,050 nits+17%
  9. Screen size7.6″ vs 6.9″+10%
  10. Resolution (width)1,840 px vs 1,080 px+70%
  11. Peak brightness1,450 nits vs 1,400 nits+4%
  12. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than Pixel Fold?

  1. AnTuTu score859,865 vs 975,461+13%
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  3. Weight283 g vs 184 g+53%
  4. Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
  5. CPU frequency2.85 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+12%
  6. Pixel density378 ppi vs 413 ppi+9%
  7. Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.5+13%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 85.1%+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight283 g184 g
Thickness5.8 mm7 mm
Height139.7 mm170.8 mm
Width158.7 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIPX8IP52
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx2
Glass protectionGorilla Glass Victus—
ColoursPorcelain, ObsidianInfinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz
Display
Screen size7.6″6.9″
PanelFoldable OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,840 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,208 px2,640 px
Pixel density378 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness1,450 nits1,400 nits
Measured brightness1,232 nits1,050 nits
Screen-to-body ratio82.7%85.1%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G2Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process5 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.85 GHz3.19 GHz
GPUMali-G710 MP7Adreno 730
AnTuTu score859,865975,461
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,8333,645
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP12 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.5
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/2.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera8 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,821 mAh3,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Wired charging30 W30 W
Charged in 30 min48%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power20 W5 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised53
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare