- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 9 Pro XL vs C65
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Realme C65
What Pixel 9 Pro XL does better (29) and where C65 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display4.9
8.1Performance3.1
9.7Camera4.6
6.7Battery6.8
9.8Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 9 Pro XLC65
| Pixel 9 Pro XL | C65 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.6 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 221 g | 185 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 9 Pro XL better than C65?
- AnTuTu score1,380,138 vs 378,8133.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,854 vs 1,5003.2×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 625 nits4.8×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- OLED panelYes · C65: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · C65: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · C65: No
- Wireless chargingYes · C65: No
- 5GYes · C65: No
- Stereo speakersYes · C65: No
Why is C65 better than Pixel 9 Pro XL?
- Wired charging37 W vs 45 W+22%
- Memory card slotNo · Pixel 9 Pro XL: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Pixel 9 Pro XL: Yes
- Weight221 g vs 185 g+19%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 7.6 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 221 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Colours | Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian | Purple Nebula, Black Milky Way |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,344 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,992 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 486 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 625 nits |
| Measured brightness | 2,365 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 85.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,380,138 | 378,813 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,854 | 1,500 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,540 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 42 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,060 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 37 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 23 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Realme UI 5.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.39.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro XLvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XL9.49.3vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsVivo X2009.39.5vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsVivo V40 Pro9.39.2vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsVivo iQOO Neo9 Pro9.39.2vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsHonor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design9.39.3