- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs X Fold5
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X Fold5
What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (6) and where X Fold5 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display9.4
6.3Performance7.8
8.0Camera8.7
4.8Battery9.3
9.3Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 9 Pro FoldX Fold5
| Pixel 9 Pro Fold | X Fold5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155.2 mm | 159.7 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Width | 150.2 mm | 142.3 mm | +7.9 mm |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm | 4.3 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 257 g | 217 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than X Fold5?
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 4+75%
- Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
- 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold5: No
- eSIMYes · X Fold5: No
- Measured brightness2,199 nits vs 1,916 nits+15%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS vs -25.7 LUFS+-6%
Why is X Fold5 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?
- Wired charging21 W vs 80 W3.8×
- AnTuTu score1,222,228 vs 1,883,303+54%
- Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+29%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783 vs 6,483+36%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620 vs 4,739+81%
- Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 4,500 nits+67%
- Active use (test)11.9 h vs 13.3 h+12%
- Wireless charging power8 W vs 40 W5.3×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 20 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 257 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm | 4.3 mm |
| Height | 155.2 mm | 159.7 mm |
| Width | 150.2 mm | 142.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP58 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Obsidian, Porcelain | Titanium Gray, Green, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,076 px | 2,200 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,152 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 373 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,700 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 2,199 nits | 1,916 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,222,228 | 1,883,303 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,783 | 6,483 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,620 | 4,739 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,650 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 11.9 h | 13.3 h |
| Wired charging | 21 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | 40 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.1 LUFS | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.98 W/kg | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsSamsung Galaxy Z Fold67.47.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro Fold8.57.4vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsXiaomi Mix Flip7.48.1vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V27.47.6vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldvsHonor Magic V Flip7.47.3vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro FoldvsVivo X Fold58.59.0