How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs X Fold3

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X Fold3

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (5) and where X Fold3 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ $760
vs
Vivo X Fold3
Vivo · 2024X Fold3
8.8Score
12 advantages≈ $970
Higher score
6.2Display9.4
8.0Camera7.4
4.8Battery8.8
9.3Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldX Fold3
150.2 × 155.25.1142.7 × 1604.7
Pixel 9 Pro FoldX Fold3Difference
Height155.2 mm160 mm−4.8 mm
Width150.2 mm142.7 mm+7.5 mm
Thickness5.1 mm4.7 mm+0.4 mm
Weight257 g219 g+38 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than X Fold3?

  1. Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · X Fold3: No
  3. 4K selfie videoYes · X Fold3: No
  4. eSIMYes · X Fold3: No
  5. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is X Fold3 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging21 W vs 80 W3.8×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+18%
  4. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 4,500 nits+67%
  5. Selfie camera10 MP vs 32 MP3.2×
  6. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  7. Max video4K vs 8K
  8. Weight257 g vs 219 g+17%
  9. Pixel density373 ppi vs 413 ppi+11%
  10. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
  11. Thickness5.1 mm vs 4.7 mm+9%
  12. Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 2,200 px+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold3Vivo X Fold3≈ $9708.8
Design
Weight257 g219 g
Thickness5.1 mm4.7 mm
Height155.2 mm160 mm
Width150.2 mm142.7 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainBlack, White
Display
Screen size8″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,076 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,480 px
Pixel density373 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness2,199 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89%90.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,222,228—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.49"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×2×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh5,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W80 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—OriginOS 4
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare