How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Fold 3

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (14) and where Galaxy Z Fold 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
14 advantages≈ $760
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
Samsung · 2021Galaxy Z Fold 3
5.8Score
3 advantages≈ $790
6.2Display5.5
8.0Camera4.6
4.8Battery4.0
9.3Features5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldGalaxy Z Fold 3
150.2 × 155.25.1128.1 × 158.26.4
Pixel 9 Pro FoldGalaxy Z Fold 3Difference
Height155.2 mm158.2 mm−3 mm
Width150.2 mm128.1 mm+22.1 mm
Thickness5.1 mm6.4 mm−1.3 mm
Weight257 g271 g−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Galaxy Z Fold 3?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 12 MP4×
  2. Optical zoom5× vs 2×2.5×
  3. Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy Z Fold 3: No
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+6%
  6. Selfie camera10 MP vs 4 MP2.5×
  7. Dual SIMYes · Galaxy Z Fold 3: No
  8. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+11%
  9. Weight257 g vs 271 g+5%
  10. Screen size8″ vs 7.6″+5%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
  12. Thickness5.1 mm vs 6.4 mm+25%

Why is Galaxy Z Fold 3 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging21 W vs 25 W+19%
  2. Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 171.3%+92%
  3. Wireless charging power8 W vs 11 W+47%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight257 g271 g
Thickness5.1 mm6.4 mm
Height155.2 mm158.2 mm
Width150.2 mm128.1 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIPX8IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainPhantom Silver, Phantom Black, Phantom Green
Display
Screen size8″7.6″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDDynamic Amoled 2X
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)2,076 px1,768 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,208 px
Pixel density373 ppi374 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits—
Measured brightness2,199 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89%171.3%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 660
AnTuTu score1,222,228—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP12 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×2×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP4 MP
4K selfie videoYes—
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh4,400 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W25 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power8 W11 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYesYes
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 11
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 3.1
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare