How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Galaxy Z Flip

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (21) and where Galaxy Z Flip wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
21 advantages≈ $760
Higher score
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Samsung · 2020Galaxy Z Flip
4.4Score
2 advantages≈ $830
6.2Display3.4
8.0Camera4.3
4.8Battery2.9
9.3Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldGalaxy Z Flip
150.2 × 155.25.173.6 × 167.37.2
Pixel 9 Pro FoldGalaxy Z FlipDifference
Height155.2 mm167.3 mm−12.1 mm
Width150.2 mm73.6 mm+76.6 mm
Thickness5.1 mm7.2 mm−2.1 mm
Weight257 g183 g+74 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Galaxy Z Flip?

  1. Main camera48 MP vs 12 MP4×
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  3. RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  4. Measured brightness2,199 nits vs 596 nits3.7×
  5. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 3,300 mAh+41%
  6. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
  8. 5GYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
  9. Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
  10. Wired charging21 W vs 15 W+40%
  11. Screen size8″ vs 6.7″+19%
  12. Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 1,080 px+92%

Why is Galaxy Z Flip better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Weight257 g vs 183 g+40%
  2. Pixel density373 ppi vs 425 ppi+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight257 g183 g
Thickness5.1 mm7.2 mm
Height155.2 mm167.3 mm
Width150.2 mm73.6 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainMirror Black, Mirror Purple, Mirror Gold, Thom Browne Edition
Display
Screen size8″6.7″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable Dynamic AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)2,076 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,636 px
Pixel density373 ppi425 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits—
Measured brightness2,199 nits596 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89%82.5%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.95 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 640
AnTuTu score1,222,228—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP12 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/2.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP10 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh3,300 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W15 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesNo
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg0.37 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 10
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 4.1.1
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare