How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Razr Ultra 2026

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (8) and where Razr Ultra 2026 wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
8 advantages≈ $760
vs
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Motorola · 2026Razr Ultra 2026
9.6Score
16 advantages≈ $750
Higher score
6.2Display9.7
6.3Performance9.5
8.0Camera8.8
4.8Battery8.6
9.3Features8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldRazr Ultra 2026
150.2 × 155.25.174 × 171.57.2
Pixel 9 Pro FoldRazr Ultra 2026Difference
Height155.2 mm171.5 mm−16.3 mm
Width150.2 mm74 mm+76.2 mm
Thickness5.1 mm7.2 mm−2.1 mm
Weight257 g199 g+58 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Razr Ultra 2026?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Razr Ultra 2026: No
  2. Measured brightness2,199 nits vs 1,424 nits+54%
  3. Screen size8″ vs 7″+14%
  4. Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 1,224 px+70%
  5. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
  6. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  7. Thickness5.1 mm vs 7.2 mm+41%
  8. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%

Why is Razr Ultra 2026 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. AnTuTu score1,222,228 vs 3,379,5912.8×
  2. Wired charging21 W vs 68 W3.2×
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783 vs 8,889+86%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
  5. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 5,000 nits+85%
  6. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+8%
  7. Selfie camera10 MP vs 50 MP5×
  8. Wireless charging power8 W vs 30 W4×
  9. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+44%
  10. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  11. Weight257 g vs 199 g+29%
  12. Pixel density373 ppi vs 462 ppi+24%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight257 g199 g
Thickness5.1 mm7.2 mm
Height155.2 mm171.5 mm
Width150.2 mm74 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIPX8IP48
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Gorilla Glass Ceramic
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainPantone: Orient Blue, Cocoa
Display
Screen size8″7″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,076 px1,224 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,992 px
Pixel density373 ppi462 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits5,000 nits
Measured brightness2,199 nits1,424 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89%87.3%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 830
AnTuTu score1,222,2283,379,591
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,7838,889
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB512 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera10 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W68 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power8 W30 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare