How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs V Purse

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Honor V Purse

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (18) and where V Purse wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
18 advantages≈ $760
Higher score
vs
Honor V Purse
Honor · 2023V Purse
4.8Score
5 advantages≈ $830
6.2Display3.3
8.0Camera3.2
4.8Battery4.9
9.3Features4.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldV Purse
150.2 × 155.25.1135.6 × 156.54.3
Pixel 9 Pro FoldV PurseDifference
Height155.2 mm156.5 mm−1.3 mm
Width150.2 mm135.6 mm+14.6 mm
Thickness5.1 mm4.3 mm+0.8 mm
Weight257 g214 g+43 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than V Purse?

  1. Optical stabilisationYes · V Purse: No
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · V Purse: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · V Purse: No
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
  5. Peak brightness2,700 nits vs 1,600 nits+69%
  6. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+3%
  7. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+29%
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · V Purse: No
  10. eSIMYes · V Purse: No
  11. Screen size8″ vs 7.7″+4%
  12. USB version3.2 vs 2+60%

Why is V Purse better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging21 W vs 35 W+67%
  2. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  3. Weight257 g vs 214 g+20%
  4. Pixel density373 ppi vs 401 ppi+8%
  5. Thickness5.1 mm vs 4.3 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor V PurseHonor V Purse≈ $8304.8
Design
Weight257 g214 g
Thickness5.1 mm4.3 mm
Height155.2 mm156.5 mm
Width150.2 mm135.6 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainBlack, Gold, Blue
Display
Screen size8″7.7″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)2,076 px2,016 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,348 px
Pixel density373 ppi401 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz90 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness2,199 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89%89.3%
HDRYes—
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 642L
AnTuTu score1,222,228—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera10 MP8 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh4,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W35 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power8 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 2.0
USB version3.22
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MagicOS 7.2
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare