How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Magic Vs3

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Honor Magic Vs3

What Pixel 9 Pro Fold does better (2) and where Magic Vs3 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google · 2024Pixel 9 Pro Fold
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ $760
vs
Honor Magic Vs3
Honor · 2024Magic Vs3
8.7Score
11 advantages≈ $1,050
Higher score
6.2Display6.7
8.0Camera9.0
4.8Battery8.3
9.3Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pixel 9 Pro FoldMagic Vs3
150.2 × 155.25.1145.2 × 156.84.6
Pixel 9 Pro FoldMagic Vs3Difference
Height155.2 mm156.8 mm−1.6 mm
Width150.2 mm145.2 mm+5 mm
Thickness5.1 mm4.6 mm+0.4 mm
Weight257 g229 g+28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pixel 9 Pro Fold better than Magic Vs3?

  1. Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
  2. USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%

Why is Magic Vs3 better than Pixel 9 Pro Fold?

  1. Wired charging21 W vs 66 W3.1×
  2. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity4,650 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+8%
  4. Wireless charging power8 W vs 50 W6.7×
  5. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  6. Weight257 g vs 229 g+12%
  7. Pixel density373 ppi vs 402 ppi+8%
  8. CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
  9. Selfie camera10 MP vs 16 MP+60%
  10. Thickness5.1 mm vs 4.6 mm+10%
  11. Resolution (width)2,076 px vs 2,156 px+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor Magic Vs3Honor Magic Vs3≈ $1,0508.7
Design
Weight257 g229 g
Thickness5.1 mm4.6 mm
Height155.2 mm156.8 mm
Width150.2 mm145.2 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlass—
Ingress protectionIPX8—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protection—King Kong Rhinoceros
ColoursObsidian, PorcelainVelvet Black, Snow, Tundra Green
Stylus—Yes
Display
Screen size8″7.9″
PanelFoldable LTPO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)2,076 px2,156 px
Resolution (height)2,152 px2,344 px
Pixel density373 ppi402 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,700 nits—
Measured brightness2,199 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89%88.6%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetGoogle Tensor G4Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerGoogleQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G715 MC7Adreno 740
AnTuTu score1,222,228—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,783—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,620—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera10 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity4,650 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)11.9 h—
Wired charging21 W66 W
Charged in 30 min46%—
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power8 W50 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYes—
Ultra WidebandYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)0.98 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—MagicOS 8.0.1
Major OS updates promised7—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare