- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 3a vs Galaxy XCover Pro
Google Pixel 3a vs Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
What Pixel 3a does better (9) and where Galaxy XCover Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display4.1
6.3Camera5.7
2.6Battery2.7
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 3aGalaxy XCover Pro
| Pixel 3a | Galaxy XCover Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 151.3 mm | 159.9 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Width | 70.1 mm | 76.7 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 10 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 147 g | 218 g | −71 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 3a better than Galaxy XCover Pro?
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy XCover Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy XCover Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy XCover Pro: No
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Weight147 g vs 218 g+48%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Galaxy XCover Pro: No
- Pixel density441 ppi vs 409 ppi+8%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 10 mm+22%
Why is Galaxy XCover Pro better than Pixel 3a?
- Main camera12 MP vs 25 MP2×
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh+35%
- Memory card slotNo · Pixel 3a: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Pixel 3a: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Screen size5.6″ vs 6.3″+12%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio75% vs 79.4%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 147 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 10 mm |
| Height | 151.3 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 70.1 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Just Black, Clearly White, Purple-ish | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.6″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,220 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 464 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75% | 79.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 | Exynos 9611 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 615 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| AnTuTu score | 322,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,564 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 196 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 25 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.39 W/kg | 0.47 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | One UI 5 |
