- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy XCover Pro vs Redmi Note 9S
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
What Galaxy XCover Pro does better (3) and where Redmi Note 9S wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Display4.2
5.7Camera6.5
2.7Battery5.8
6.0Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy XCover ProRedmi Note 9S
| Galaxy XCover Pro | Redmi Note 9S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 165.8 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.7 mm | = |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 209 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy XCover Pro better than Redmi Note 9S?
- NFCYes · Redmi Note 9S: No
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9S better than Galaxy XCover Pro?
- Main camera25 MP vs 48 MP+92%
- Battery capacity4,050 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+24%
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
- Weight218 g vs 209 g+4%
- Process10 nm vs 8 nm+25%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness10 mm vs 8.8 mm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio79.4% vs 84.5%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 575 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.4% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9611 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 254,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 25 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,050 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.47 W/kg | 0.72 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover ProvsInfinix Note 75.15.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy XCover ProvsMotorola Moto G Power5.15.2
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9S6.45.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 95.04.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9S6.25.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SvsInfinix Note 75.05.0
