- android.gs
- Compare
- K3 Pro vs Galaxy A12
Gionee K3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A12
What K3 Pro does better (3) and where Galaxy A12 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Display2.6
4.2Camera5.3
2.4Battery4.0
2.4Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
K3 ProGalaxy A12
| K3 Pro | Galaxy A12 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is K3 Pro better than Galaxy A12?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Galaxy A12 better than K3 Pro?
- Main camera16 MP vs 48 MP3×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- NFCNo · K3 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · K3 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.35 GHz+18%
- Bluetooth4 vs 5+25%
- Thickness9.7 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Jade Green, Pearl White | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 472 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.7% | 82.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 107,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,034 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 20% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 4 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 4.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

