- android.gs
- Compare
- 5 vs X8b
Fairphone 5 vs Honor X8b
What 5 does better (17) and where X8b wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
5X8b
| 5 | X8b | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.1 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.6 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 6.8 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 166 g | +46 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 5 better than X8b?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,886 vs 1,475+96%
- AnTuTu score584,498 vs 396,111+48%
- Optical stabilisationYes · X8b: No
- 5GYes · X8b: No
- NFCYes · X8b: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X8b: No
- Memory card slotYes · X8b: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · X8b: No
- eSIMYes · X8b: No
- Pixel density459 ppi vs 394 ppi+16%
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+13%
Why is X8b better than 5?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness880 nits vs 2,000 nits2.3×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Wired charging30 W vs 35 W+17%
- Weight212 g vs 166 g+28%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 6.8 mm+41%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.7% vs 89.9%+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 166 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP55 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Matte Black, Sky Blue, Transparent | Glamorous Green, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 880 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 772 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 89.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QCM6490 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 643 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 584,498 | 396,111 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,886 | 1,475 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 35 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -31 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.4 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Stock Android | MagicOS 7.2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
