android.gs
Compare
Aurora A31 vs Galaxy S25 FE

Doro Aurora A31 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What Aurora A31 does better (2) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (22) — every spec side by side.

Doro · 2025Aurora A31

4.5Score

2 advantages≈ $390

Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE

8.9Score

22 advantages≈ $380

Higher score

3.0Display8.1

5.3Camera9.3

3.5Battery4.8

3.5Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Aurora A31Galaxy S25 FE

	Aurora A31	Galaxy S25 FE	Difference
Height	170 mm	161.3 mm	+8.7 mm
Width	75 mm	76.6 mm	−1.6 mm
Thickness	11 mm	7.4 mm	+3.6 mm
Weight	207 g	190 g	+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Aurora A31 better than Galaxy S25 FE?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+2%
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Aurora A31?

Wired charging10 W vs 45 W4.5×
Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
OLED panelNo · Aurora A31: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · Aurora A31: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Aurora A31: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Aurora A31: Yes
5GNo · Aurora A31: Yes
NFCNo · Aurora A31: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Aurora A31: Yes
RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
CPU frequency2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doro Aurora A31≈ $3904.5	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE≈ $3808.9
Design
Weight	207 g	190 g
Thickness	11 mm	7.4 mm
Height	170 mm	161.3 mm
Width	75 mm	76.6 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	—	Icyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size	6.1″	6.7″
Panel	IPS	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,560 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	282 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	—	89.2%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G85	Exynos 2400
Chip maker	Mediatek	Exynos
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Mail G52 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,262
Memory
RAM	6 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	—	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	—	12 MP
4K selfie video	—	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	4,900 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.9 h
Wired charging	10 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	—	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, compass, hall	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	—	0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	43 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A