android.gs
Compare
S200 Ultra vs Poco F7 Pro

Doogee S200 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

What S200 Ultra does better (8) and where Poco F7 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025S200 Ultra

8.5Score

8 advantages≈ $590

Xiaomi · 2025Poco F7 Pro

9.3Score

16 advantages≈ $580

Higher score

6.9Display9.1

6.9Camera9.0

9.4Battery8.1

8.2Features9.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

S200 UltraPoco F7 Pro

	S200 Ultra	Poco F7 Pro	Difference
Height	179.5 mm	160.3 mm	+19.2 mm
Width	82.5 mm	75 mm	+7.5 mm
Thickness	19.1 mm	8.1 mm	+11 mm
Weight	383 g	206 g	+177 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is S200 Ultra better than Poco F7 Pro?

Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+83%
Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Storage (base)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
Memory card slotYes · Poco F7 Pro: No
Drop resistance classA vs C
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Endurance per cycle98 h vs 70 h+41%

Why is Poco F7 Pro better than S200 Ultra?

OLED panelNo · S200 Ultra: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · S200 Ultra: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · S200 Ultra: Yes
Weight383 g vs 206 g+86%
Wired charging66 W vs 90 W+36%
Thickness19.1 mm vs 8.1 mm2.4×
Pixel density392 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+27%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · S200 Ultra: Yes
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Energy classB vs A

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee S200 Ultra≈ $5908.5	Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro≈ $5809.3
Design
Weight	383 g	206 g
Thickness	19.1 mm	8.1 mm
Height	179.5 mm	160.3 mm
Width	82.5 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Yellow, Green	Black, Blue, Silver
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,478 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.6%	89.3%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7400	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	—	2,065,265
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,661
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,921
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	1,024 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Main sensor size	1/1.8"	1/1.55"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	11,000 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.8 h
Wired charging	66 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	81%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	B	A
Battery charge cycles	1,000	1,000
Endurance per cycle	98 h	70 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	C