- android.gs
- Compare
- Note59 Pro+ vs Galaxy A17 4G
Doogee Note59 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What Note59 Pro+ does better (10) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.0
5.4Camera7.8
7.3Battery5.3
7.1Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note59 Pro+Galaxy A17 4G
| Note59 Pro+ | Galaxy A17 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 164.4 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note59 Pro+ better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Battery capacity6,250 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+25%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Repairability classB vs C
- Drop resistance classA vs B
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+5%
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Note59 Pro+?
- OLED panelNo · Note59 Pro+: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note59 Pro+: Yes
- Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 385 ppi+48%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note59 Pro+: Yes
- Energy classC vs A
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 7.5 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Blue, White | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T8200 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,250 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 52 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | B |
