- android.gs
- Compare
- Blade20 Play vs Pova 7 4G
Doogee Blade20 Play vs Tecno Pova 7 4G
What Blade20 Play does better (9) and where Pova 7 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display9.0
6.1Camera5.6
8.6Battery8.8
8.2Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade20 PlayPova 7 4G
| Blade20 Play | Pova 7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174 mm | 168.6 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 76.6 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 9.3 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Weight | 362 g | 203 g | +159 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade20 Play better than Pova 7 4G?
- Battery capacity10,300 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+47%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- 5GYes · Pova 7 4G: No
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Pova 7 4G better than Blade20 Play?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Blade20 Play: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade20 Play: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight362 g vs 203 g+78%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 396 ppi+48%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blade20 Play: Yes
- Thickness15.8 mm vs 9.3 mm+70%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.1% vs 84.5%+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 362 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 174 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Red, Silver | Hyper Titanium, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 573,915 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,014 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 86 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
