android.gs
Compare
Blade GT vs Poco X7 Pro

Doogee Blade GT vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

What Blade GT does better (3) and where Poco X7 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.

Doogee · 2025Blade GT

8.0Score

3 advantages≈ $370

Xiaomi · 2025Poco X7 Pro

9.1Score

18 advantages≈ $370

Higher score

6.9Display8.9

8.0Camera8.8

6.7Battery7.6

8.2Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GTPoco X7 Pro

	Blade GT	Poco X7 Pro	Difference
Height	178.5 mm	160.8 mm	+17.7 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.2 mm	+8.3 mm
Thickness	10.5 mm	8.3 mm	+2.2 mm
Weight	260 g	195 g	+65 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT better than Poco X7 Pro?

Memory card slotYes · Poco X7 Pro: No
Drop resistance classA vs C
Battery charge cycles1,300 vs 1,000+30%

Why is Poco X7 Pro better than Blade GT?

Wired charging18 W vs 90 W5×
OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT: Yes
Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
Weight260 g vs 195 g+33%
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.25 GHz+25%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Energy classE vs C
Pixel density392 ppi vs 446 ppi+14%
Endurance per cycle30 h vs 50 h+63%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Doogee Blade GT≈ $3708.0	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro≈ $3709.1
Design
Weight	260 g	195 g
Thickness	10.5 mm	8.3 mm
Height	178.5 mm	160.8 mm
Width	83.5 mm	75.2 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Black, Silver	Black/Yellow, White, Green, Red (Iron Man Edition)
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,220 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,712 px
Pixel density	392 ppi	446 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	3,200 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,265 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.1%	88.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7050	Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.25 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Mali-G720 MC7
AnTuTu score	—	1,568,331
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,880
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	—	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	20 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,500 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	12.7 h
Wired charging	18 W	90 W
Charged in 30 min	—	71%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	E	C
Battery charge cycles	1,300	1,000
Endurance per cycle	30 h	50 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	A	C