How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Blade GT vs Galaxy S25 FE

Doogee Blade GT vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

What Blade GT does better (5) and where Galaxy S25 FE wins (24) — every spec side by side.

Doogee Blade GT
Doogee · 2025Blade GT
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $370
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung · 2025Galaxy S25 FE
8.9Score
24 advantages≈ $380
Higher score
6.9Display8.1
8.0Camera9.3
6.7Battery4.8
8.2Features9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Blade GTGalaxy S25 FE
83.5 × 178.510.576.6 × 161.37.4
Blade GTGalaxy S25 FEDifference
Height178.5 mm161.3 mm+17.2 mm
Width83.5 mm76.6 mm+6.9 mm
Thickness10.5 mm7.4 mm+3.1 mm
Weight260 g190 g+70 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Blade GT better than Galaxy S25 FE?

  1. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 4,900 mAh+12%
  3. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 FE: No
  5. Selfie camera20 MP vs 12 MP+67%

Why is Galaxy S25 FE better than Blade GT?

  1. Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
  2. OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Telephoto cameraNo · Blade GT: Yes
  5. Wireless chargingNo · Blade GT: Yes
  6. Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT: Yes
  7. 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
  8. Weight260 g vs 190 g+37%
  9. Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
  10. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+23%
  11. Max video4K vs 8K
  12. 4K selfie videoNo · Blade GT: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Doogee Blade GTDoogee Blade GT≈ $3708.0
Design
Weight260 g190 g
Thickness10.5 mm7.4 mm
Height178.5 mm161.3 mm
Width83.5 mm76.6 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
ColoursBlack, SilverIcyblue, Jetblack, Navy, White
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDDynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,340 px
Pixel density392 ppi385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,900 nits
Measured brightness—1,247 nits
Screen-to-body ratio73.1%89.2%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Exynos 2400
Chip makerMediaTekExynos
Process6 nm4 nm
CPU cores810
CPU frequency2.6 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score—1,521,140
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—6,948
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,262
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage type—UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera48 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size—1/1.57"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps120 fps
Selfie camera20 MP12 MP
4K selfie videoNoYes
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh4,900 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Active use (test)—11.9 h
Wired charging18 W45 W
Charged in 30 min—65%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—15 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.54 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—One UI 9
Major OS updates promised—7
EU label
Energy classEB
Battery charge cycles1,3002,000
Endurance per cycle30 h43 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classAA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare